My Photo

Tel: (678) 795-0900

  • Search Engine Experts.com Linked-In Networking Group:
    Search Engine Experts Linked-In Network
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

June 17, 2008

Career Advice for SEO's

BOSTON, MA - Some quick advice for SEO's / SEM's looking to get ahead in the world:  Make sure that any brand you mention on your resume is on the first page of Google's organic rankings at the time of your resume submission.

I just reviewed the resume of an SEO who's working with a major consumer brand.  He has three bullets on his resume about all of the great things he's doing for the brand, but when I Googled the brand name (ie "Coke" or "Gucci"), he wasn't even on the first page.  Not good.

SEO's, please bear in mind that I use Aaron Wall's SEO toolbar for Firefox, and I can tell how many back links your pages are getting (and from whom), how many times they get Del.icio.us'd, and so on.  It's all right there.  I also have a subscription to Keyword Discovery -- so I have an idea of how competitive your categories are, where you might be spending your PPC dollars, etc.

I'm not trying to impress you.  Actually, my point is that I'm not any smarter than the average recruiter.  All recruiters and potential employers can see how you are doing.  Your results are on the web.

When Google ranks your client, it ranks YOU.

These days, recruiters can tell if an SEO candidate is any good.  And given the dynamism of the web, it's okay to lose once in a while.  We understand, especially if your category is dominated by black and gray hats (mortgages, vitamin supplements, etc).

But it's not okay to lose and put it on your resume that you are #1 or #2 for seven out of eight keyword phrases.  I'm not as dum as you think I are.  I know how to use Google.  Everyone does.

Zemanta Pixie

June 05, 2008

Local Search is Brutal for Recruiters

CHICAGO, IL - I'm not quite sure what the technical SEO lesson is here, but it has been a fairly expensive foray for yours truly.  Two years ago I snapped up the domains "ExecutiveSearch____.com" -- where the "____" was the name of a top 50 metro US city.  For example, I bought ...

Times fifty.  Then I started blogging on as many of those sites as I could.  Man.  Talk about time consuming.  It was exhausting.  Setting up all of those blogs ... changing the c-names ... editing my content so that it would match the local market ...

It's not like I'm insane.  It was a theoretically valid keyword-density play, where the URL would contain the keywords I needed to get recruiting business in those cities.  Seemed like a good idea at the time -- and it made sense from a naming standpoint.

So imagine my surprise tonight when I checked on the Google results for "Executive Search Chicago."  Not only am I not even on the first page of the results -- but even if I were, who would care?

Look at all that clutter!  How is any prospective client who uses Google (and they all do!) supposed to pick one recruiter out of the geo-mapped pack at the top of the results page?  Proximity?  Forget it.

Memo to executive search firms:  You need an instantly recognizable INDUSTRIAL or FUNCTIONAL differentiation.  You cannot just say "we have the best relationships" and expect the phone to ring.  It won't.  Which leaves you with three choices:

  1. networking,
  2. cold calling, and
  3. SEO.

I've done all three.  SEO is by far the most effective -- and it's certainly the most scalable.  In that sense, maybe the SEO lesson here is that it's not how well you optimize your site, but that you have a business concept worth marketing in the first place.
__________________________________________
  Get my latest searches.   (Opt out anytime.)

May 22, 2008

SEO Jobs: "How Many Tools Are On Your Peg Board?"

ATLANTA - On Saturday, I was listening to "Costas On The Radio" the weekly program of one of my all-time favorite sportscasters, Bob Costas, who has now ventured into non-sports broadcasting.

Jimmy_fallon He was interviewing Darrell Hammond, long-time cast member of Saturday Night Live. Costas asked Hammond a thought-provoking question that -- as I thought about it -- had implications for leaders everywhere. Costas was discussing Jimmy Fallon, a fellow SNL cast mate of Hammond, having just been named by NBC to replace Conan O'Brien on The Late Show in 2009 when Conan takes over for Leno on the Tonight Show.

"You've worked with Jimmy Fallon for years," Costas said, "Why do you think he's the right choice to host that show?" Hammond didn't miss a beat. "Because he's a total performer," he said. "I'm not. I'm good at a couple things. I can do good sketch comedy with an ensemble team. And I can do impressions. That's it. But Jimmy Fallon -- he can do it all."

Hammond went on to say Fallon can do sketch, he can do impressions, he can do dialects -- young, middle age, and old -- and he can write comedy too.  He simply does it all.  He's multi-dimensional. For a comedian, that list is the full monty.  When you realize the breadth of Fallon's comedic talents, it's no wonder he got the nod over others.

Simply put, he's a safe bet to nail the laughs and reel in the ratings. It reminded me of a corollary in baseball -- the 5-tool player -- a rare bird indeed.  He's the guy who can run, throw, field, hit for average, and hit for power. In the major leagues, he's on the Most Wanted list.  Highest paid too.  There aren't many.

Most players are lucky to have two or three in their bag of tricks.  But to excel at all five is to be the sought-after needle in the haystack. Now ... shift to leaders.  And to you.

How many leadership tools are on your peg board? What Jimmy Fallon is to comedy ... and what a 5-tool player is to baseball ... YOU must be to leadership. Multi-dimensional.  Multi-skilled.  Multi-talented.

Lessons & Actions For You:

Let's say you're highly effective at presentations.  Pretty good at working a room.  And not bad at leading meetings.  But those are pretty much all the arrows in your quiver. You're in trouble.

Or let's say you're the new business closer and exceptionally good at it.  You're a planner and organizer to beat the band.  And you've got a genius for marketing.  But that's it. You're in trouble.

See where I'm going with this? Let me be more specific:  A handful of leadership tools on your peg board ain't gonna cut it. Want proof?  Some of the greatest leaders of all time have spoken out on the subject. John Wooden, famed UCLA men's basketball coach, who still today owns more national championships than any other coach living or dead, diagrams 17 critical leader traits in his success pyramid from his book "Wooden on Leadership".

As you read the book, you then realize he's burrowing down even deeper into mini points that, if you're counting, could tally over 60 or 70. Colin Powell, former secretary of state and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff -- in his book "The Leadership Secrets of Colin Powell" -- has 16 chapters, each one digging into an important leadership quality.  And inside each chapter, you can flush out more sub-points, for a total of, I'm thinking, maybe 50 to 75 traits.

Jack Welch, legendary CEO of GE, has spoken of more than 30 must-have attributes of effective leaders. In "Robert E. Lee on Leadership", written by H. W. Crocker, there are 11 chapters.  Each one ends with a bullet-point list of "Lee's Lessons" that summarizes the content.  I counted.  Total of 52 behaviors, traits and lessons for leaders.

I could go on, but you get the picture.  There's an endless list of books, CDs, courses, workshops and seminars on leadership -- and every author has his or her list of traits. Go ahead.  Read, listen to, or attend any one of them.  I challenge you to argue with their logic.  They ALL make sense. Watch any sporting event. Then watch the post-game interview with the head coach.

In a 15-second sound bite, the astute viewer/listener can grab two or three tidbits of leadership wisdom -- each one a profound lesson on its own.

Bottom line:  Leadership is multi-dimensional.  And by "multi", I don't mean three or four.  Or eight or nine.  Or 22 or 23. I mean dozens and dozens.  Like courage.  Initiative.  Integrity.  Loyalty.  Enthusiasm.  Vision.  Honor. Serving others first.  Trustworthiness.  Hopefulness.  Goal-oriented.  Inspirer of others. Delegator.  Risk-taker.  And on and on and on.

I've only scratched the surface. If all this scares you -- and it should -- you may want to re-think your leadership role. Make sure you're up to the task, up to the challenge, up to the responsibility. Your followers -- whether they number only one or two -- or as many as 10,000 or a million -- all deserve you to be effective at all the many facets of marketing leadership.

No, not a few. Not just the ones you like. Not just the ones that don't upset you. All of them. And the ones you're not good at?  Work on them until you are. It's not an option to ignore them. The more you study leadership, the longer will grow your list of critically important traits you must embrace.

Leadership is not for everyone.  It's not for the squeamish.  Not for those with wobbly knees. Nor the feint of heart.  And certainly not for those who intend to just eek by with a couple of key skills, and zero interest in developing the rest. If the pressure of having to be proficient at such a long list of attributes troubles you, get out now, before you embarrass yourself and topple the enterprise.

If, on the other hand, you're energized by it all, you seek to learn more every day, and you're on a non-stop quest to improve yourself and acquire the marketing knowledge and skills to lead with honor, dignity and daring ... then you are in the rarified air that the world's greatest leaders have breathed.

Which are you?  Let this be your wake-up call to decide. You can't be an effective leader by going at it half-hearted.  Wherever you are on the "leadership continuum", you will always have more to learn. Will you? Will you start today?
__________________________________________________________

Rick Houcek is President of Soar With Eagles in Atlanta.   To subscribe to his newsletter, please visit Soar with Eagles.com and fill in your name and email address in the upper left of the home page.

March 02, 2008

Google Diverts Wikipedia Traffic?

LEEDS, UK - Today I discovered a great new band called The New Mastersounds.  Their stuff is of the MGs and Meters instrumental variety.  Funky.  Supa fuhnkee.  I'd love to hear Amy Winehouse backed by these guys...

Anyway, the band is currently touring the east coast, and as I perused their site, I was struck by their use of maps, downloads, copyright permissions, and DIY club posters.  They make it so E-Z for their fans, vendors (i.e. club owners), and mainstream media to support them.  Especially for club owners who need to promote the band's upcoming gigs at their venues, it's like "insta-marketing."  Lots of ideas to swipe on this site.

PS - When I went to include links to this post, I Googled "wikipedia" and I got a SEARCH BOX in the Google SERPWatch what happens when you enter a string into the box.  Gee.  Somehow, I think this diversion of traffic goes beyond having "just another SERP" on which Adwords can appear.  Don't you?  I mean, it's not as if we are talking about a ton of traffic that Google is siphoning off.  Are they making a statement with this tactic?  Seriously, I'd like to know your thoughts.
______________________________________________________
  Get my latest searches.   (Opt out anytime.)

January 27, 2008

Call For Guest Authors

Are you a search engine expert?  Great!  That makes one of us!

How would you like to blog right here -- at SearchEnigineExperts.com??  I'd like to turn this space into a group blog.  Open source, baby!  I may not be the Michael Jordan of SEM, but I'm a talented writer and a good editor.  So only apply if you are prepared to bring your A-game.  You'll need to think and write like a search engine expert -- which means you'll pretty much need to BE a search engine expert.

There's no money in it, by the way.  But there is visibility on one of the best SEO domains around.  You submit articles and I'll publish them here giving you full credit.  You can include your name, employer, and your email address.  Any business you get is yours completely.  I won't be involved at all.

The articles will remain your intellectual property "in perpetuity and throughout the universe" as lawyers like to say.  My only request is that if you leave the fold, please leave your posts here.  You can publish them anywhere else you like -- but please don't yank them off this site.  Broken links, etc.

If you think I'm smoking something, please say so in the comments section below.  And if you'd like to become a guest author, please send me an email and I'll contact you for your references and writing samples.  This sounds more stringent than it is:  This is the same process I went though before going live on MarketingProfs DailyFix and DuctTape Marketing.  Nothing personal.  It's just a QC measure.

I look forward to hearing from you!

January 22, 2008

"Search Engine Advisors.com" seeks $65K

Snap Names has listed the domain SearchEngineAdvisors.com for sale on its site for $65,315.  And that's just for starters.  The domain could fetch more than that once the bidding starts tomorrow.  Stay tuned.

December 27, 2007

Does Dot-Jobs Work?

PITTSBURGH, PA - Last week I was contacted by a company with a .Jobs TLD.  "TLD" stands for Top Level Domain, and you see them every day in the form of a .com, .net, .org, or dot-whatever.

Two years ago, the dot-jobs TLD was launched with great fanfare, partially as a way for corporate recruiting departments to maintain EZ-to-find career sites for their candidates -- but mostly as a way for these sites to jump to the front of the organic SERP's.

Sort of like a Special Access Pass at Disney World.

Essentially, dot-jobs was an SEO play marketed in the name of improving the jobseeker's search experience.  The pitch was that jobseekers who Google for "Merck jobs" (for example) would prefer to see the positions offered by Merck first -- and then see the "less relevant" job board and recruiter listings farther down the search result.  Dot-jobs conferred instant legitimacy.

For dot-jobs customers, the arduous SEO tasks of updating keyword rich content and back linking were, presumably, to be secondary concerns.  A standalone career site hosted on a dot-jobs domain was a trump card: dot-jobs beats dot-com, beats dot-net, beats dot-biz, and so on.  PPC costs would tumble, the argument went, as career sites floated to their "rightful place" at the top of the organic results.  Sweet victory!

It was a good ideaBut in practice, dot-jobs doesn't seem to be working out that way.  Here is the career site of the company who contacted me.  And here is the search I did for them on Google.  Where's the dot-jobs result?  M.I.A.

Now curious, I ran some other Google searches for dot-jobs career sites:

Note:  These aren't just random companies.  They're companies being touted on the dot-jobs homepage as flagship customers.  Only Publix enjoys a top ranking with its dot-jobs domain.  Everybody else is trailing the job boards that dot-jobs was supposed to preempt.  Merck even has a testimonial on the dot-jobs homepage, yet Merck's dot-jobs page is fifth in the organic rankings (at least for my Google datacenter).  Ouch.

What gives?  Is a dot-jobs domain worth the $120/year investment?  That's more than twelve times what dot-com domains sell for.  Somebody enlighten me.
__________________________________________
  Get my latest searches.   (Opt out anytime.)

December 16, 2007

Can you spot an SEO star?

SAN FRANSISCO - David Rodnitzky of Blogation has an excellent post about the dearth of high quality director-level SEO candidates on the market right now.  Per David,

Over the last few years, I've learned to not even bother looking when I get a [recruiter's] call for a director of search.  Why?  Well, they simply don't exist.  Basically, search engine marketing is such a hot profession right now that you only really have three types of search marketers: 1) entry-levels; 2) VPs; and 3) independents or consultants.

Yesirree.  Slim pickins out there in search engine land.  That's not to say that talented people can't be had -- if you know what you're looking for.

And David is proof:  In 2005, I submitted him to a Chicago-based online retailer who, without even speaking with him, turned him down on the grounds that "he was too green."  They based their decision solely on David's resume, which was amazing even back then.  That was the single biggest missed hiring opportunity I have ever seen, on a par with the Portland Trail Blazers selecting Sam Bowie over Michael Jordan in the 1984 NBA draft.

Another HUGE missed hiring opportunity was this year, when one of my LA-based online retailing clients passed on Jessica Bowman because "their search was just getting started" and, I presume, they wanted to see if they could fill the role themselves.  Again, the client wouldn't even make time to speak with the candidate -- if for no other reason than to learn something about in-house SEM.  Go figure.

In both cases, the candidates were interested in the jobs and affordable.  The clients simply couldn't spot a star.  Their loss -- because this month BOTH of these SEM experts had feature articles in the Search Marketing Standard.  In the words of Warren Buffett, "Conventional accounting doesn't pick up errors like that."

My point in name dropping like this is that clients say they want great SEM talent, yet all too often they cannot recognize it when it lands in their lap.  Clients need to work with credible SEO recruiters -- and listen to their recruiters when they get a "buy recommendation" because they may not get a second chance.

After all, the difference between salad and garbage is timing.
__________________________________________
  Get my latest searches.   (Opt out anytime.)

December 15, 2007

How to Quit Your Job

BOSTON, MA - Last week I closed a search for a Boston-based ecommerce company.  As usual, the client was wonderful, and the candidate is a very talented individual who had accomplished a great deal in his most recent job.  He had been there for five years.

But here's the rub:  While my candidate has a long track record of success, his last six months on the job were somewhat tension-filled, largely because he was assigned to a new boss who does not understand the internet.  My father used to tell me that "people tend to fear what they don't understand and kill what they fear."

Such was the case here.

My candidate's Luddite boss clung to some antiquated ideas about marketing and was determined to minimize the internet's influence on the company's marketing initiatives.  Right.  Long story short, I helped my candidate find a more future-oriented employer, and on Monday he will resign.  [Notice that the job change was not about the money.  It was about a better opportunity.]

How to resign your job:

Imagine that within the last year, you and your spouse have been having serious, irreconcilable problems.  Over the years you have both changed, and a while back you met someone with whom you are infinitely more compatible.  You have decided that as painful as it seems, it's time to make a change.

In a love relationship, you'd simply sit down with your spouse and say "Honey, it's over."  If you're a merciful person, you're a strong dumper:  You'd state your case in a way that's gentle yet firm, and hard on the issues and soft on the people.  No finger pointing.

Resigning a job is similar, but it differs in two ways:

1.)  You need your old employer to act as a reference. You want to leave the people in your professional life with a good taste in their mouths about you.  What a crazy world it would be if your new spouse asked to speak with your old spouse about you before accepting your marriage proposal!

Well, that's the way it works in the real world, folks.  And you can expect the reference checking questions to be a regular kiss and tell.  Therefore, it's absolutely essential that you maintain the highest level of professionalism before, during, and after your resignation -- because you will ALWAYS be expected to use your current employer as a reference.

2.)  Your departure can create the appearance of trouble in your current company.  While this is less of an issue for line level employees, I have worked with several senior executives whose departure from a company was construed within the professional community as a sign that something was seriously wrong with their employer.  Customers, bankers, and vendors might well ask "How on earth could they let him go?  What's wrong with them??"  Such chatter is bad for everyone, including you.

If you are leaving your company, here's a list of things to do -- and NOT to do:

DO tell your boss first that you are leaving -- and do it face to face.

DO plan what you are going to say ahead of time.

DO volunteer to train your replacement.  If you're a responsible, owner-mined executive, then you will already have some idea of who your replacement should be.  Ideally, you would have groomed this person to take over for you -- regardless of whether your company decides to bring in an outsider to replace you.  A train wreck after your departure might make you feel vindicated that your company should have loved you more while you were there -- but it won't do anything for your reputation.

DO be the first person to tell your coworkers, unless your employer insists on doing that for you.  They have the right of way.

DO finish up all of your pending assignments.  It's very important to stay productive during your final weeks on the job, because a strong finish will keep your references strong when you need them again.

DON'T take a counter offer.  Statistically speaking, most people who take a counter offer are gone within twelve months.  Much more on this later.

DON'T resign in the middle of a major crisis.  It creates the impression that when the going gets tough, you're a wimp.  Nobody wants to hire a wimp.

DON'T air your grievances to anyone other than the relevant company leaders.  And even then, do it privately and off line (no email trails!).  There's a great scene in Saving Private Ryan where Capt. Miller (Tom Hanks) is speaking with one of his troops, who's complaining to his squad about the mission they're on ...

  • Private Jackson:   From my way of thinkin', sir, this entire mission is a serious misallocation of valuable military resources.
  • Captain Miller:  Yeah? Go on.
  • Private Jackson:  Well, it seems to me, sir, that God gave me a special gift, made me a fine instrument of warfare.
  • Captain Miller:  Reiben, pay attention: now, this is the way to gripe. Continue, Jackson.
  • Private Jackson:  Well, what I mean by that, sir, is... if you was to put me and this here sniper rifle anywhere up to and includin' one mile of Adolf Hitler with a clear line of sight, sir... pack your bags, fellas, war's over. Amen.
  • Private Reiben:  Oh, that's brilliant, bumpkin. Hey, so, Captain, what about you? I mean, you don't gripe at all?
  • Captain Miller:  I don't gripe to *you*, Reiben. I'm a captain. There's a chain of command. Gripes go up, not down. Always up. You gripe to me, I gripe to my superior officer, so on, so on, and so on. I don't gripe to you. I don't gripe in front of you. You should know that as a Ranger.
  • Private Reiben:  I'm sorry, sir, but uh... let's say you weren't a captain, or maybe I was a major. What would you say then?
  • Captain Miller:  Well, in that case... I'd say, "This is an excellent mission, sir, with an extremely valuable objective, sir, worthy of my best efforts, sir. Moreover... I feel heartfelt sorrow for the mother of Private James Ryan and am willing to lay down my life and the lives of my men - especially you, Reiben - to ease her suffering."
  • Mellish: [chuckles]  He's good.
  • Private Caparzo:  I love 'im.

Obviously, Capt. Miller's the kind of guy I would advise my clients to hire.  My search fee would be lost in the rounding of the value that guy would create!  And you know that if he hadn't gotten killed at the end of the movie, his references would have been stellar.
__________________________________________
  Get my latest searches.   (Opt out anytime.)

December 13, 2007

Paid Search for Domainers

Eye_popping_deals Cue the Twilight Zone music.  Now, look deep, deeeeep into the future:  Last week I posted about my recent Google dream.  And last night I had another internet marketing dream -- this time about web browsers.  I gotta lay off the Welsh wabbit!

So here's the dream:  The major browsers (Firefox, Microsoft, et al.) introduced a new feature wherein any web surfer automatically has his URL completed with a paid result as he types the URL into his browser.

For example, suppose you want to visit my site, MarketingHeadhunter.com.  As you start to type "m-a-r-k-e-t-n-g-h-e-a-d-..." your browser anticipates the end of the string and automatically completes it with a paid result, such as "marketingheadhunters.net".  Careless surfers who hit Enter would be sent to that site.  In my dream, the only way my prospect could get to my site was to type in my entire URL, "marketingheadhunter.com" ... and then hit Enter.

Firefox's answer to Google Adwords

For the sake of result relevancy, marketinghead... might be completed with

  • marketingheadache
  • marketingheadhunter.net, .org. etc
  • marketingheadhunters.com, .net, etc
  • marketingheadhunting.com, .net, etc
  • and so on.

This service might be the browsers' version of Adwords -- allowing my competitors to usurp my prospect's type-in string so long as the completion was relevant.  Subdomains could work too, such as marketingheadhunters.mri.com.  Even the savviest domainers like Frank Schilling and Rick Schwartz don't have the resources to tie up every single iteration of a given generic domain.  It's just not practical.

Talk about disruption!  Anyone intending to enter my domain name would have the browser auto-complete with the domain of any one of my competitors -- thereby siphoning off my type-in traffic.  Google already offers similar "suggestion" functionality for its popular toolbar.

Do you think this could happen?  The way I see it, the only way this wouldn't be bad for my business is if all web users entered URLs the way I do:  With the name of the dot-com site in the browser bar, followed by the keystroke "Cntrl-Enter."  Scary.
__________________________________________
  Get my latest searches.   (Opt out anytime.)